Question:
"Our results indicate that prior use of condoms does not appear to be a
specific risk factor for sensitization to latex in post-partum women at
high-risk for atopy" WHAT NONSENSE. EVERY SINGLE REPORT ON LATEX ALLERGIES CLEARLY STATES THAR
REPEATED EXPOSURE INCREASES RISK.
HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THEM.
Answer:
Are condoms a greater health risk than the std's they don't really protect
against? It is politically correct to advocate condoms but every day the evidence
increases that they do little to protect and may pose a very serious
health risk. It is hard for the CDC and FDA to examine these risks as they
have been so vocal in promoting condoms but could their silence lead to
dire consequences. I for one having done exaustive research strongly feel
so.
"...... new concerns are arising regarding allergic or other toxic
reactions to various components of latex condoms such as vulcanization
accelerators, latex proteins, spermicides and finishing powders."
"* Studies are needed to evaluate the best lubricants to use in the
manufacture of condoms. Evidence suggests that the right quantity, type
and placement of lubricant is important for condom functionality,
acceptability and safety.
In addition, the added value and risk presented by spermicidal lubricants
and by dry finishing powders (e.g. talc or cornstarch) should be
critically examined."
"Since the late 1980s the reported incidence
of allergy to natural rubber latex has increased dramatically, as much as
12 -fold."
"Latex allergy is incurable, although the symptoms, such as itching,
soreness, painful blistering, runny noses, swollen eyes, asthma symptoms
and anaphylaxis can be ameliorated. Time and again, I've shown that there is a sea of data that proves beyond
doubt that condoms pose a MAJOR health risk. In your usual blind manner you refuse to accept ANY fact that you do not
like.
Condoms contain carcinogens and teratogens in substantial quantities as
the FDA clearly admits.
